university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit
The University of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS), a prominent institution offering metaphysical education, has faced significant attention due to a series of legal disputes known as the university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit. These lawsuits, initiated by a competitor, International Metaphysical Ministry, began in 2017 and centered on allegations of deceptive advertising practices. The most recent university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit was dismissed on May 12, 2025, marking a significant milestone for UMS. This article provides an in-depth look at the background of UMS, the details of the lawsuits, UMS’s response, the impact on students, and the broader implications of these legal battles.
Background of the University of Metaphysical Sciences
The University of Metaphysical Sciences is a private, distance-learning institution based in Arcata, California, dedicated to providing accessible and affordable education in metaphysics. Founded with a mission to foster spiritual growth and personal transformation, UMS offers a variety of programs, including bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees in metaphysics, spiritual counseling, holistic healing, energy work, and other non-traditional spiritual disciplines. The institution operates primarily online, allowing students from around the world to study at their own pace.
UMS is accredited by the International Accreditation Association for Continuous Online Education (IACOE), a body recognized for non-traditional education. With a focus on affordability and flexibility, UMS has built a strong reputation, as evidenced by positive reviews on platforms like Trustpilot, where it holds a five-star rating based on feedback from 287 customers.
Details of the University of Metaphysical Sciences Lawsuit
The university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit saga began in 2017 when International Metaphysical Ministry, a competing organization in the metaphysical education space, filed the first of three lawsuits against UMS. The primary allegation was that UMS engaged in deceptive advertising by running online ads that used the competitor’s name, a claim UMS has consistently denied. Below is a detailed timeline of the lawsuits:
| Lawsuit | Case Number | Filing Date | Location | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Lawsuit | 3:17-cv-08280-JJT | December 28, 2017 | Arizona, transferred to California | Settled, no liability, no money exchanged |
| Second Lawsuit | 4:18-cv-04524-SBA | July 26, 2018 | California | Settled, both parties walked away, no liability |
| Third Lawsuit | 4:21-cv-08066-KAW | October 14, 2021 | Northern California Federal Court | Dismissed on May 12, 2025 |
The core issue in these lawsuits was an ads dispute, with International Metaphysical Ministry alleging that UMS used their name in Google ads to divert potential students. UMS provided evidence from its Google Adwords account, including reports showing that the competitor’s name was on a negative keyword list, meaning UMS actively avoided using it in ads. The dismissal of the third university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit in 2025, along with the settlements of the earlier cases without liability, suggests that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence.
UMS has described these lawsuits as frivolous and part of a predatory litigation strategy by the competitor to gain a monopoly in the metaphysical education market. The competitor reportedly spent over $1 million on legal fees by 2023, with estimates reaching $1.4–1.5 million by 2025, according to public tax records.
UMS’s Response and Defense
UMS has been proactive in addressing the university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit, maintaining transparency through detailed updates on its website and platforms like Medium and LinkedIn. The institution has consistently denied the allegations, emphasizing that it has never been found liable for any wrongdoing. UMS provided substantial evidence, including Google Adwords reports, to disprove the claims of deceptive advertising.
In 2023, UMS won key summary judgments in the third lawsuit, which weakened the competitor’s case. For example, it was revealed that one of the competitor’s trademarks was renewed with a forged signature two years after the founder’s death, and only one of the four trademarks at issue was valid until April 2021. UMS’s strong financial position allowed it to pursue a jury trial, refusing settlement offers, as it was confident in its evidence.
To manage the financial burden of legal defense, UMS launched a tax-deductible legal defense fund under its 501(c)3 status, encouraging supporters to contribute. This fund helped cover legal expenses, ensuring that UMS could continue its operations without disruption. UMS’s financial stability, with consistent profits each year, contrasts with the competitor’s reported losses, largely attributed to legal fees.
Impact on UMS and Students
The university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit had no impact on UMS’s day-to-day operations, accreditation, business practices, tuition fees, or course quality. The institution has reassured students and prospective students that the lawsuits were solely about an ads dispute and did not involve students, faculty, or government agencies. No claims were made regarding the validity of UMS’s degrees or the quality of its curriculum.
UMS’s commitment to its educational mission remained steadfast throughout the legal battles. The institution continues to offer its programs to a global audience, with positive student feedback highlighting the quality of its courses. The dismissal of the university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit in 2025 further reinforces UMS’s stability and reliability as an educational provider.
Online Slander and SEO Manipulation
Beyond the courtroom, UMS faced an aggressive online slander campaign orchestrated by the competitor. This campaign included:
- Fake Articles: Over 600 fake articles were posted since November 6, 2024, containing false information about UMS’s accreditation, operations, and the university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit. Many of these articles were generated using AI tools like ChatGPT and contained viruses.
- SEO Manipulation: In September 2024, approximately 8,000 derogatory search terms, such as “university of metaphysical sciences sedona arizona,” were spammed into Google’s “people also search for” section, despite UMS not being located in Sedona. This caused market confusion and aimed to tarnish UMS’s reputation.
- Disparaging Pages: In July 2024, the competitor posted two disparaging pages targeting UMS, further escalating the online attacks.
UMS has actively countered these tactics by filing DMCA takedown requests to remove fake articles and planning a John Doe petition to address the spammed search terms and misinformation. Despite these challenges, UMS’s official website and Medium pages have remained top search results, reflecting the institution’s resilience.
Conclusion
The dismissal of the university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit on May 12, 2025, marks a significant victory for UMS, concluding a nearly decade-long legal battle. Having successfully defended itself against three lawsuits, UMS has demonstrated its resilience and commitment to its mission of providing accessible metaphysical education. The institution’s transparency, supported by court records and evidence, reinforces its credibility.
For students and prospective students, UMS remains a reputable and reliable choice for metaphysical studies. The university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit serves as a cautionary tale about the challenges faced by non-traditional educational institutions but also highlights UMS’s ability to overcome adversity. As UMS moves forward, it continues to focus on its vision of fostering spiritual growth and personal transformation for students worldwide.
FAQs
- Is the University of Metaphysical Sciences still operational?
Yes, UMS is fully operational and continues to offer its courses and degrees without interruption. - What was the university of metaphysical sciences lawsuit about?
The lawsuits were about an ads dispute, with the competitor alleging that UMS used their name in advertising, a claim UMS disproved with evidence. - Has UMS been found guilty of any wrongdoing?
No, UMS has never been found liable in any of the lawsuits. All cases were either settled without liability or dismissed. - Are there any concerns about the validity of degrees from UMS?
No, the lawsuits did not affect the validity of degrees or the quality of education provided by UMS. - How can I support UMS?
You can support UMS by enrolling in their programs, sharing positive experiences, or contributing to their legal defense fund. - What steps is UMS taking against the online slander?
UMS is filing DMCA takedown requests and planning a John Doe petition to remove fake articles and manipulated search terms. - Is UMS accredited?
Yes, UMS is accredited by the International Accreditation Association for Continuous Online Education (IACOE). - Can I trust the information provided by UMS about the lawsuit?
Yes, UMS has provided transparent information, including case numbers and outcomes, verifiable through court records. - Will there be more lawsuits in the future?
While it’s impossible to predict, UMS has stated it will vigorously defend itself against any future legal challenges. - How has the lawsuit affected UMS’s financial stability?
UMS has remained financially stable, showing profits each year, and managed legal expenses through a defense fund.
Citations
- UMS Lawsuit Update
- University of Metaphysical Sciences Lawsuit
- Christine Breese on Medium
About the Author
